The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Newport Fishermen's Wives, Inc. et al v. United States Coast Guard et al
[Order on Motion for Extension of Time]
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[Order on Motion for Extension of Time]
- Court
- Oregon District
- First added here
- August 18, 2026
- Last entry
- October 9, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
[Order on Motion for Extension of Time]
[Order on Motion for Extension of Time]
[Order on Motion for Extension of Time]
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Oregon District
Granted
The court's record, as written
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. 8 is GRANTED. The Court hereby issues an injunction ORDERING the U.S. Coast Guard and the Department of Homeland Security acting by and through Secretary Kristi Noem to immediately restore and maintain the status quo ante that has prevailed since 1987 by returning the rescue helicopter to the Coast Guard's Newport Air Facility, together with full operational capabilities, infrastructure and personnel support. This injunction shall continue in force and effect for fourteen (14) days from the date and time of this Order. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to promptly serve this Order on Defendants. Following service,
Outcome words in this text: Restraining Order, GRANTED, injunction.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 6 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
