The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
District court · DCD
AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION, et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
No. 1:24-cv-03385District of Columbia District
[Set/Reset Deadlines]
The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[Set/Reset Deadlines]
- Court
- District of Columbia District
- First added here
- August 12, 2026
- Last entry
- October 19, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
[Set/Reset Deadlines]
Docket entry
[Set/Reset Deadlines]
Docket entry
[Order on Sealed Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal]
Docket entry
[Order on Motion to Amend/Correct]
Docket entry
[~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines]
Docket entry
[Set/Reset Deadlines]
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
2 entries, oldest first.
· District of Columbia District
Granted
The court's record, as written
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: 1) Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym is GRANTED, subject to any further consideration by the United States District Judge to whom this case is randomly assigned; and 2) All parties shall use the pseudonyms listed in the Complaint in all documents filed in this action. Signed by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 12/11/2024. (lcjeb1) Modified to correct document type and publish on 2/10/2025 (znbn).
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· District of Columbia District
Other
The court's record, as written
[Order on Motion to Amend/Correct]
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 13 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket