The State of Alabama Department of Revenue v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
No. 2:11-cv-00272 · Alabama Middle District. Each entry below is the court's own record, with its date and a link. This page does not say which side is ahead or what an entry means.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Alabama Middle District
DismissedGranted
The court's record, as written
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Alabama Department of Revenue failed to allege sufficient facts to establish that it had a valid lien at the time BB&T entered into the Purchase and Assumption Agreement with the FDIC. What is more, the ADOR's complaint lacked any facts suggesting that its tax liens, if valid, would have priority against a purchaser like BB&T. For these reasons, it is hereby ordered that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is GRANTED and the complaint against BB&T is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/17/2012. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED, DISMISSED.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket