The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
District court · ALMD
The State of Alabama Department of Revenue v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
No. 2:11-cv-00272Alabama Middle District
The official docket is on file.
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
Docket on file
- Court
- Alabama Middle District
- First added here
- January 17, 2012
- Last entry
- July 9, 2012
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
We have no individual docket entries for this case yet.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Alabama Middle District
DismissedGranted
The court's record, as written
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Alabama Department of Revenue failed to allege sufficient facts to establish that it had a valid lien at the time BB&T entered into the Purchase and Assumption Agreement with the FDIC. What is more, the ADOR's complaint lacked any facts suggesting that its tax liens, if valid, would have priority against a purchaser like BB&T. For these reasons, it is hereby ordered that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is GRANTED and the complaint against BB&T is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/17/2012. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED, DISMISSED.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket