Purcell v. Tidewater Construction Corp.
No. 941414 · Supreme Court of Virginia. Each entry below is the court's own record, with its date and a link. This page does not say which side is ahead or what an entry means.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedDismissed
The court's record, as written
941414 Purcell v. Tidewater Construction Corp. 06/09/1995 The plaintiff's suit for retaliatory discharge from employment is not a suit for a positive, physical or mental hurt and he advances no other applicable limitation period, therefore his cause of action is subject to the limitation period established in Code § 8.01-248 and the judgment dismissing his action as untimely filed is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket