The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Purcell v. Tidewater Construction Corp.
No. 941414Supreme Court of Virginia
941414 Purcell v. Tidewater Construction Corp. 06/09/1995 The plaintiff's suit for retaliatory discharge from employment is not a suit for a positive, physical or mental hurt and he advances no other applicabl…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
941414 Purcell v. Tidewater Construction Corp. 06/09/1995 The plaintiff's suit for retaliatory discharge from employment is not a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 9, 1995
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
941414 Purcell v. Tidewater Construction Corp. 06/09/1995 The plaintiff's suit for retaliatory discharge from employment is not a suit for a positive, physical or mental hurt and he advances no other applicable limitation period, therefore his cause of action is subject to the limitation period established in Code § 8.01-248 and the judgment dismissing his action as untimely filed is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedDismissed
The court's record, as written
941414 Purcell v. Tidewater Construction Corp. 06/09/1995 The plaintiff's suit for retaliatory discharge from employment is not a suit for a positive, physical or mental hurt and he advances no other applicable limitation period, therefore his cause of action is subject to the limitation period established in Code § 8.01-248 and the judgment dismissing his action as untimely filed is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links