Norfolk Beverage Company v. Cho
No. 990528 · Supreme Court of Virginia. Each entry below is the court's own record, with its date and a link. This page does not say which side is ahead or what an entry means.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
990528 Norfolk Beverage Company v. Cho 03/03/2000 In this appeal of judgments entered in consolidated tort actions, the jury's verdicts were not excessive and the circuit court did not err by permitting an expert witness to render an opinion that certain medical expenses that the plaintiffs incurred were related to their injuries. The judgments of the circuit court are affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket