The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
HERITAGE FOUNDATION et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[Scheduling Order]
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[Scheduling Order]
- Court
- District of Columbia District
- First added here
- August 10, 2026
- Last entry
- October 16, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· District of Columbia District
Other
The court's record, as written
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on March 25, 2025. (lccjn2)
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 3 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
