The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Supreme Court · SCOTUS
Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock
No. 24-935Supreme Court of the United States
Judgment Issued.
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Decision on file
What the Court said
The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.
Official outcomeAdjudged to be AFFIRMED.
Read the published opinion ↗
- Decision date
- May 28, 2026
- Opinion author
- NG
- October Term
- 2025
- Docket
- No. 24-935
The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
Judgment Issued.
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- First added here
- August 10, 2026
- Last entry
- June 29, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Decision and docket history
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Docket entry
The Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption from compelled arbitration for workers “engaged in . . . interstate commerce,” 9 U. S. C. §1, can apply to a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey and who does not cross state lines or interact with vehicles that do. [608/2]
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Argued. For petitioners: Traci L. Lovitt, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Jennifer D. Bennett, San Francisco, Cal.
Docket entry
Record received from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
Docket entry
CIRCULATED
Docket entry
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
Docket entry
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Docket entry
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 25, 2026.
Docket entry
Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Motion to extend the time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted in part and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2026.
Docket entry
Application (25A789) denied by Justice Gorsuch.
Docket entry
Application (25A789) to extend the time to file the reply brief on the merits, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Motion for an extension of time to file respondent's brief on the merits filed.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Motion of Angelo Brock for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (January 06, 2026)
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
4 entries, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
Petition GRANTED.
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Denied
The court's record, as written
Application (25A789) denied by Justice Gorsuch.
Outcome words in this text: denied.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Outcome words in this text: AFFIRMED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Other
The court's record, as written
Judgment Issued.
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 49 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links
Source record
Official video
Hearing, press and court recordings
AudioOral argument audio: Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock (No. 24-935)
Supreme Court of the United States · March 25, 2026
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.
Supreme Court of the United States · March 25, 2026
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.
Attached only where an official listing names this record's exact number or title. Nothing loads from YouTube until you choose "Load player"; the video is never copied to Power & Politics.