Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
District court · CAED

Mid-Valley Investment Co., LLC v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, et al.

No. 1:25-cv-00945California Eastern District

[Opposition to Motion]

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

[Opposition to Motion]

At a glance
Court
California Eastern District
First added here
August 22, 2026
Last entry
August 21, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

1 entry, oldest first.

  1. · California Eastern District

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/26/2026. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The parties shall show cause in writing no later than February 27, 2026 why monetary sanctions should not issue for the failure to file a joint scheduling report as required by the February 19, 2026 order (ECF No. 13); The parties shall file a joint scheduling report no later than February 27, 2026 as required by the February 19, 2026 order (ECF No. 13); and Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. (Deputy Clerk CLA)

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket