The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Mid-Valley Investment Co., LLC v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, et al.
[Opposition to Motion]
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[Opposition to Motion]
- Court
- California Eastern District
- First added here
- August 22, 2026
- Last entry
- August 21, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· California Eastern District
Other
The court's record, as written
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/26/2026. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The parties shall show cause in writing no later than February 27, 2026 why monetary sanctions should not issue for the failure to file a joint scheduling report as required by the February 19, 2026 order (ECF No. 13); The parties shall file a joint scheduling report no later than February 27, 2026 as required by the February 19, 2026 order (ECF No. 13); and Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. (Deputy Clerk CLA)
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
