The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety
Judgment Issued.
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.What the Court said
The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.
Official outcomeAdjudged to be AFFIRMED.
Read the published opinion ↗
- Decision date
- June 23, 2026
- Opinion author
- NG
- October Term
- 2025
- Docket
- No. 23-1197
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
Judgment Issued.
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- First added here
- August 10, 2026
- Last entry
- July 27, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Decision and docket history
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor and Kagan, JJ., joined.
State employees may not be held liable in their personal capacities under a Spending Clause statute such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 unless those individuals have voluntarily and knowingly consented to answer private suits under the statute; the individual defendants in this case did not do so here, so Landor’s case cannot proceed against them. [609/1]
Open court document ↗Argued. For petitioner: Zachary D. Tripp, Washington, D. C.; and Libby A. Baird, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: J. Benjamin Aguiñaga, Solicitor General, Baton Rouge, La.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Open court document ↗Brief of respondents Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Open court document ↗Brief amicus curiae of National Sheriffs’ Association filed. (Distributed)
Open court document ↗CIRCULATED
Record received electronically from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana and available with the Clerk.
Brief amicus curiae of National Police Accountability Project filed.
Open court document ↗Brief amici curiae of National Congress of American Indians, et al. filed.
Open court document ↗Brief amici curiae of United States Senator Ted Cruz, et al. filed.
Open court document ↗Brief amici curiae of Religious and Civil-Rights Organizations filed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
3 entries, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
Petition GRANTED.
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor and Kagan, JJ., joined.
Outcome words in this text: AFFIRMED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Other
The court's record, as written
Judgment Issued.
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 59 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Source record
Hearing, press and court recordings
Supreme Court of the United States · November 10, 2025
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.
Attached only where an official listing names this record's exact number or title. Nothing loads from YouTube until you choose "Load player"; the video is never copied to Power & Politics.
