Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative ink ripple expressing the outward consequence of a Supreme Court decision
Supreme Court · SCOTUS

Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety

No. 23-1197Supreme Court of the United States

Judgment Issued.

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
Decision on file

What the Court said

The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.

Official outcome

Adjudged to be AFFIRMED.

Read the published opinion ↗
Decision date
June 23, 2026
Opinion author
NG
October Term
2025
Docket
No. 23-1197
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

Judgment Issued.

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
First added here
August 10, 2026
Last entry
July 27, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Decision and docket history

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor and Kagan, JJ., joined.

Docket entry

State employees may not be held liable in their personal capacities under a Spending Clause statute such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 unless those individuals have voluntarily and knowingly consented to answer private suits under the statute; the individual defendants in this case did not do so here, so Landor’s case cannot proceed against them. [609/1]

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Argued. For petitioner: Zachary D. Tripp, Washington, D. C.; and Libby A. Baird, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: J. Benjamin Aguiñaga, Solicitor General, Baton Rouge, La.

Docket entry

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Docket entry

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief of respondents Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of National Sheriffs’ Association filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

CIRCULATED

Docket entry

Record received electronically from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana and available with the Clerk.

Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of National Police Accountability Project filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of National Congress of American Indians, et al. filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of United States Senator Ted Cruz, et al. filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Religious and Civil-Rights Organizations filed.

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

3 entries, oldest first.

  1. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Granted

    The court's record, as written

    Petition GRANTED.

    Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.

  2. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Affirmed

    The court's record, as written

    Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor and Kagan, JJ., joined.

    Outcome words in this text: AFFIRMED.

  3. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    Judgment Issued.

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 59 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket

Official video

Hearing, press and court recordings

AudioOral argument audio: Landor v. LA DOC (No. 23-1197)
Supreme Court of the United States · November 10, 2025
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.

Attached only where an official listing names this record's exact number or title. Nothing loads from YouTube until you choose "Load player"; the video is never copied to Power & Politics.