The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Supreme Court · SCOTUS
West Virginia v. B. P. J.
No. 24-43Supreme Court of the United States
Judgment Issued.
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Decision on file
What the Court said
The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.
Official outcomeJudgment REVERSED and case REMANDED.
Read the published opinion ↗
- Decision date
- June 30, 2026
- Opinion author
- BK
- October Term
- 2025
- Docket
- No. 24-43
The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
Judgment Issued.
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- First added here
- August 10, 2026
- Last entry
- August 3, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Decision and docket history
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., and Gorsuch, J., filed concurring opinions. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Kagan and Jackson, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. (Opinion also for No. 24-38). VIDED.
Docket entry
Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex; West Virginia and Idaho did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by maintaining female sports teams for biological females. [609/2]
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Supplemental Brief of West Virginia, et al. not accepted for filing. (May 28, 2026--Revised document and filing type to be submitted.)
Docket entry
Argued. For petitioners: Michael R. Williams, Solicitor General, Charleston, W. Va.; and Hashim M. Mooppan, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Joshua A. Block, New York, N. Y.
Docket entry
Sealed material received electronically from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. The remainder of the record is electronic and is available on PACER.
Docket entry
CIRCULATED
Docket entry
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Docket entry
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
Docket entry
Brief amici curiae of Practicing Pediatric Endocrinologists, et al. filed. VIDED.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Brief amici curiae of Advocates for Girls' and Women's Rights filed. VIDED.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. VIDED.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Brief amici curiae of GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders, et al. filed. VIDED.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
3 entries, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
Petition GRANTED.
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., and Gorsuch, J., filed concurring opinions. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Kagan and Jackson, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. (Opinion also for No. 24-38). VIDED.
Outcome words in this text: REVERSED, REMANDED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Other
The court's record, as written
Judgment Issued.
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 128 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links
Source record
Official video
Hearing, press and court recordings
AudioOral argument audio: West Virginia v. B. P. J. (No. 24-43)
Supreme Court of the United States · January 13, 2026
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.
Supreme Court of the United States · January 13, 2026
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.
Attached only where an official listing names this record's exact number or title. Nothing loads from YouTube until you choose "Load player"; the video is never copied to Power & Politics.