The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State ex rel. Bristolville 25 Developer, L.L.C. v. Lordstown
State ex rel. Bristolville 25 Developer, L.L.C. v. Lordstown 2025-1497Mandamus—Village lacks clear legal duty to proceed with review of data-center developer’s site plan because it is subject to ordinance plac…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
State ex rel. Bristolville 25 Developer, L.L.C. v. Lordstown 2025-1497Mandamus—Village lacks clear legal duty to proceed with rev…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Ohio
- First added here
- October 20, 2026
- Last entry
- October 20, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
State ex rel. Bristolville 25 Developer, L.L.C. v. Lordstown 2025-1497Mandamus—Village lacks clear legal duty to proceed with review of data-center developer’s site plan because it is subject to ordinance placing a temporary moratorium on issuing of any new permits, as well as receipt and processing of permit applications, for proposed data centers—Relators have not shown a clear legal right to have developer’s site plan reviewed under premoratorium zoning ordinance—Gibson v. Oberlin and Fairmount Ctr. Co. v. Arnold distinguished—Writ denied.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-4073 10/20/2026 10/20/2026 2026-Ohio-4073
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
This court's public feed does not carry later entries in a case, so we do not show rulings from it. The court's own docket is linked on this page. Open the court's docket
