Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
District court · ORD

Northwest Environmental Defense Center et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al

No. 3:23-cv-01335Oregon District

[Order on Motion to Amend/Correct]

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

[Order on Motion to Amend/Correct]

At a glance
Court
Oregon District
First added here
October 19, 2026
Last entry
October 19, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

2 entries, oldest first.

  1. · Oregon District

    DismissedGrantedDenied

    The court's record, as written

    ORDER - The Court must construe Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF 21) as a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So construed, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion to dismiss on ripeness grounds. ECF 21. The Court also DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. ECF 19. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF 1) without prejudice. Signed on 3/30/2026 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

    Outcome words in this text: GRANTS, DENIES, DISMISSES.

  2. · Oregon District · Entry 60

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    [Order on Motion to Amend/Correct]

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket