The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State appellate court · ST-TX-COA13
Hidalgo Independent School District and Yesenia Ayala, Diana Silva, Benjamin Arjona, and Martin Carrasco in their official capacity as members of the Board of Trustees of Hidalgo Independent School District v. RG Enterprises, LLC d/b/a G&G Contractors
No. 13-26-00552-CVThirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas
Hidalgo Independent School District and Yesenia Ayala, Diana Silva, Benjamin Arjona, and Martin Carrasco in their official capacity as members of the Board of Trustees of Hidalgo Independent School District v.…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
Hidalgo Independent School District and Yesenia Ayala, Diana Silva, Benjamin Arjona, and Martin Carrasco in their official capaci…
- Court
- Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas
- First added here
- October 10, 2026
- Last entry
- October 8, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
Hidalgo Independent School District and Yesenia Ayala, Diana Silva, Benjamin Arjona, and Martin Carrasco in their official capacity as members of the Board of Trustees of Hidalgo Independent School District v. RG Enterprises, LLC d/b/a G&G Contractors — Opinion in case 13-26-00552-CV
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Hidalgo Independent School District and Yesenia Ayala, Diana Silva, Benjamin Arjona, and Martin Carrasco in their official capacity as members of the Board of Trustees of Hidalgo Independent School District v. RG Enterprises, LLC d/b/a G&G Contractors — Opinion in case 13-26-00552-CV
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 2 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links