The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
REYNOLDS VS. TUFENKJIAN
REYNOLDS VS. TUFENKJIAN — Opinion/Non-Dispositional: Filed Non-Dispositional Opinion "Motion granted in part; appeal dismissed in part." We grant respondents' motion to substitute themselves for appellants as …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
REYNOLDS VS. TUFENKJIAN — Opinion/Non-Dispositional: Filed Non-Dispositional Opinion "Motion granted in part; appeal dismissed in…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nevada
- First added here
- October 6, 2026
- Last entry
- April 9, 2020
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
REYNOLDS VS. TUFENKJIAN — Opinion/Non-Dispositional: Filed Non-Dispositional Opinion "Motion granted in part; appeal dismissed in part." We grant respondents' motion to substitute themselves for appellants as to those claims and to voluntarily dismiss this appeal as to those claims. Accordingly, we reinstate briefing solely as to the summary judgment on appellants' claims for fraud and elder exploitation. Respondents shall have 30 days from the date of this opinion to file and serve the answering brief. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). Before Hardesty/Stiglich/Silver. Author: Silver, J. Majority: Silver/Hardesty/Stiglich. 136 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 19. SNP20-…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
This court's public feed does not carry later entries in a case, so we do not show rulings from it. The court's own docket is linked on this page. Open the court's docket
