The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Parker v. Miller
No. 942076Supreme Court of Virginia
942076 Parker v. Miller 07/21/1995 Since no written notice was given to the owner of an abutting lot, as required by Code §§ 15.1-431 and -495, a zoning variance for construction of a convenience store on a lo…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
942076 Parker v. Miller 07/21/1995 Since no written notice was given to the owner of an abutting lot, as required by Code §§ 15.1…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- July 21, 1995
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
942076 Parker v. Miller 07/21/1995 Since no written notice was given to the owner of an abutting lot, as required by Code §§ 15.1-431 and -495, a zoning variance for construction of a convenience store on a lot considerably smaller than required by a city zoning ordinance for that use was granted without the proper authority. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, the decision of the board of zoning appeals is vacated, the variance is invalidated without prejudice, and the
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedVacatedGranted
The court's record, as written
942076 Parker v. Miller 07/21/1995 Since no written notice was given to the owner of an abutting lot, as required by Code §§ 15.1-431 and -495, a zoning variance for construction of a convenience store on a lot considerably smaller than required by a city zoning ordinance for that use was granted without the proper authority. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, the decision of the board of zoning appeals is vacated, the variance is invalidated without prejudice, and the
Outcome words in this text: granted, reversed, vacated.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links