The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Graham v. Commonwealth
No. 950948Supreme Court of Virginia
950948 Graham v. Commonwealth 11/03/1995 The trial court did not err in its instructions to the jury and its judgment in this capital murder case is affirmed. The evidence in this case satisfies the requiremen…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
950948 Graham v. Commonwealth 11/03/1995 The trial court did not err in its instructions to the jury and its judgment in this cap…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 3, 1995
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
950948 Graham v. Commonwealth 11/03/1995 The trial court did not err in its instructions to the jury and its judgment in this capital murder case is affirmed. The evidence in this case satisfies the requirements of Code § 18.2-31(7) in that the defendant was the triggerman in the principal murder charged, and that he was at least an accomplice in the murder of an additional person as part of the same act or transaction.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
950948 Graham v. Commonwealth 11/03/1995 The trial court did not err in its instructions to the jury and its judgment in this capital murder case is affirmed. The evidence in this case satisfies the requirements of Code § 18.2-31(7) in that the defendant was the triggerman in the principal murder charged, and that he was at least an accomplice in the murder of an additional person as part of the same act or transaction.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links