The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Collins v. Fuller
No. 950648Supreme Court of Virginia
950648 Collins v. Fuller 01/12/1996 Since the trial court erroneously restricted the manner in which an express right of way could be used to the laying and maintaining of a water line to a spring, and there i…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
950648 Collins v. Fuller 01/12/1996 Since the trial court erroneously restricted the manner in which an express right of way coul…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 12, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
950648 Collins v. Fuller 01/12/1996 Since the trial court erroneously restricted the manner in which an express right of way could be used to the laying and maintaining of a water line to a spring, and there is no basis to impose that limitation, the decree is reversed and the final judgment is entered.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
950648 Collins v. Fuller 01/12/1996 Since the trial court erroneously restricted the manner in which an express right of way could be used to the laying and maintaining of a water line to a spring, and there is no basis to impose that limitation, the decree is reversed and the final judgment is entered.
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links