The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Toomey v. Toomey
950578 Toomey v. Toomey 01/12/1996 The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to consider a nonresident party's motion for equitable distribution that was filed more than 21 days after a final decree had been…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
950578 Toomey v. Toomey 01/12/1996 The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to consider a nonresident party's motion for equit…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 12, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
950578 Toomey v. Toomey 01/12/1996 The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to consider a nonresident party's motion for equitable distribution that was filed more than 21 days after a final decree had been entered in a divorce suit and the order of the Court of Appeals affirming the circuit court's decree in favor of the nonresident party is reversed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmed
The court's record, as written
950578 Toomey v. Toomey 01/12/1996 The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to consider a nonresident party's motion for equitable distribution that was filed more than 21 days after a final decree had been entered in a divorce suit and the order of the Court of Appeals affirming the circuit court's decree in favor of the nonresident party is reversed.
Outcome words in this text: affirming, reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
