The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
First Virginia Bank v. O'Leary
950149 First Virginia Bank v. O'Leary 03/01/1996 State and local taxing authorities are not bound by Code § 6.1- 125.3(D), requiring creditors seeking funds from a joint bank account to obtain a summons notify…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
950149 First Virginia Bank v. O'Leary 03/01/1996 State and local taxing authorities are not bound by Code § 6.1- 125.3(D), requir…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- March 1, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
950149 First Virginia Bank v. O'Leary 03/01/1996 State and local taxing authorities are not bound by Code § 6.1- 125.3(D), requiring creditors seeking funds from a joint bank account to obtain a summons notifying nondelinquent owners of the account of an order of garnishment, attachment or other levy addressed to that account, therefore, the Dept. of Taxation is not subject to that section when it issues a notice of tax lien and demand for payment to a financial institution which has in its possession funds owned by a delinquent taxpayer in a joint bank account.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
