The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Bennet v. Virginia Life
950808 Bennet v. Virginia Life 04/19/1996 Since provisions of Code § 38.2-1700(C)(5) exclude from coverage any contract or certificate which is not both issued to and owned by an individual, guaranteed interes…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
950808 Bennet v. Virginia Life 04/19/1996 Since provisions of Code § 38.2-1700(C)(5) exclude from coverage any contract or certif…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- April 19, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
950808 Bennet v. Virginia Life 04/19/1996 Since provisions of Code § 38.2-1700(C)(5) exclude from coverage any contract or certificate which is not both issued to and owned by an individual, guaranteed interest contracts which were issued to a group rather than to individuals were not protected by the Virginia Life, Accident and Sickness Insurance Guaranty Association and the State Corporation Commission's holding is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
950808 Bennet v. Virginia Life 04/19/1996 Since provisions of Code § 38.2-1700(C)(5) exclude from coverage any contract or certificate which is not both issued to and owned by an individual, guaranteed interest contracts which were issued to a group rather than to individuals were not protected by the Virginia Life, Accident and Sickness Insurance Guaranty Association and the State Corporation Commission's holding is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
