The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Plummer v. Center Psychiatrists
952306 Plummer v. Center Psychiatrists 09/13/1996 Since the trial court erred by holding, as a matter of law, that a psychologist who had sexual intercourse with a patient during therapy was acting outside the…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
952306 Plummer v. Center Psychiatrists 09/13/1996 Since the trial court erred by holding, as a matter of law, that a psychologist…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 13, 1996
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
952306 Plummer v. Center Psychiatrists 09/13/1996 Since the trial court erred by holding, as a matter of law, that a psychologist who had sexual intercourse with a patient during therapy was acting outside the scope of his employment, rendering the doctrine of respondeat superior inapplicable, that judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
952306 Plummer v. Center Psychiatrists 09/13/1996 Since the trial court erred by holding, as a matter of law, that a psychologist who had sexual intercourse with a patient during therapy was acting outside the scope of his employment, rendering the doctrine of respondeat superior inapplicable, that judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
