The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Matthews v. Virginia Dept. of Transportation
961140 Matthews v. Virginia Dept. of Transportation 02/28/1997 Given the location and circumstances of the plaintiff's fall on a ferry boat, the trial court erred in ruling that the action was not a maritime t…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
961140 Matthews v. Virginia Dept. of Transportation 02/28/1997 Given the location and circumstances of the plaintiff's fall on a …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 28, 1997
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
961140 Matthews v. Virginia Dept. of Transportation 02/28/1997 Given the location and circumstances of the plaintiff's fall on a ferry boat, the trial court erred in ruling that the action was not a maritime tort to be decided under federal admiralty law. The judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
961140 Matthews v. Virginia Dept. of Transportation 02/28/1997 Given the location and circumstances of the plaintiff's fall on a ferry boat, the trial court erred in ruling that the action was not a maritime tort to be decided under federal admiralty law. The judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
