The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Blair Construction v. Weatherford
No. 961079Supreme Court of Virginia
961079 Blair Construction v. Weatherford 04/18/1997 Since the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that would permit a jury to find that the defendant subcontractor committed acts of construct…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
961079 Blair Construction v. Weatherford 04/18/1997 Since the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that would pe…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- April 18, 1997
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
961079 Blair Construction v. Weatherford 04/18/1997 Since the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that would permit a jury to find that the defendant subcontractor committed acts of constructive fraud in submitting a bid to the plaintiff construction company, the trial court's action granting the defendant's motion to strike a claim for constructive fraud is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedGranted
The court's record, as written
961079 Blair Construction v. Weatherford 04/18/1997 Since the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that would permit a jury to find that the defendant subcontractor committed acts of constructive fraud in submitting a bid to the plaintiff construction company, the trial court's action granting the defendant's motion to strike a claim for constructive fraud is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: granting, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links