The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Jenkins v. Commonwealth
961459 Jenkins v. Commonwealth 09/12/1997 Because admission of certain expert testimony against the accused in a criminal case constituted reversible error, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, th…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
961459 Jenkins v. Commonwealth 09/12/1997 Because admission of certain expert testimony against the accused in a criminal case co…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 12, 1997
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
961459 Jenkins v. Commonwealth 09/12/1997 Because admission of certain expert testimony against the accused in a criminal case constituted reversible error, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, the conviction is annulled, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with direction to remand it to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
961459 Jenkins v. Commonwealth 09/12/1997 Because admission of certain expert testimony against the accused in a criminal case constituted reversible error, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, the conviction is annulled, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with direction to remand it to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
