The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
County of Fairfax v. Century Concrete Services
961854 County of Fairfax v. Century Concrete Services 10/31/1997 The trial court erred in imposing prejudgment and judgment interest against a county, contrary to the mandate of Code § 15.1-549, and that porti…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
961854 County of Fairfax v. Century Concrete Services 10/31/1997 The trial court erred in imposing prejudgment and judgment inter…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- October 31, 1997
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
961854 County of Fairfax v. Century Concrete Services 10/31/1997 The trial court erred in imposing prejudgment and judgment interest against a county, contrary to the mandate of Code § 15.1-549, and that portion of the judgment is reversed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
961854 County of Fairfax v. Century Concrete Services 10/31/1997 The trial court erred in imposing prejudgment and judgment interest against a county, contrary to the mandate of Code § 15.1-549, and that portion of the judgment is reversed.
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
