The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Yeagle v. Collegiate Times
971304 Yeagle v. Collegiate Times 02/27/1998 The trial court correctly dismissed a defamation action because as a matter of law the phrase at issue could not reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts a…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
971304 Yeagle v. Collegiate Times 02/27/1998 The trial court correctly dismissed a defamation action because as a matter of law t…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 27, 1998
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
971304 Yeagle v. Collegiate Times 02/27/1998 The trial court correctly dismissed a defamation action because as a matter of law the phrase at issue could not reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about the plaintiff, and that judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedDismissed
The court's record, as written
971304 Yeagle v. Collegiate Times 02/27/1998 The trial court correctly dismissed a defamation action because as a matter of law the phrase at issue could not reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about the plaintiff, and that judgment is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: dismissed, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
