The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Mounts
No. 971074Supreme Court of Virginia
971074 Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Mounts 02/27/1998 Given the statutory mandate to insure and keep insured its liability, an employer with employees susceptible to pneumoconiosis must anticipate that claims …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
971074 Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Mounts 02/27/1998 Given the statutory mandate to insure and keep insured its liability, an em…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 27, 1998
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
971074 Uninsured Employer's Fund v. Mounts 02/27/1998 Given the statutory mandate to insure and keep insured its liability, an employer with employees susceptible to pneumoconiosis must anticipate that claims may accrue in the future and must secure its liability for potential claims as required by § 65.2-801, even when its insurer has been declared insolvent. Here there was a failure to do so, and the Court of Appeals correctly found the Uninsured Employer's Fund is liable because the employer violated its statutory duty.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links