The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Virginia Housing Dev. Auth. v. Fox Run Ltd.
No. 970924Supreme Court of Virginia
970924 Virginia Housing Dev. Auth. v. Fox Run Ltd. 02/27/1998 Because the chancellor erred in finding that prior to a foreclosure the public housing authority had not made an election to impose a prepayment fe…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
970924 Virginia Housing Dev. Auth. v. Fox Run Ltd. 02/27/1998 Because the chancellor erred in finding that prior to a foreclosure…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 27, 1998
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
970924 Virginia Housing Dev. Auth. v. Fox Run Ltd. 02/27/1998 Because the chancellor erred in finding that prior to a foreclosure the public housing authority had not made an election to impose a prepayment fee authorized under the deed of trust on a multi-family housing project, and the trustee's advertisement of the sale substantially complied with the requirements of Code § 55-59.3, the trial court's judgment is reversed and final judgment is entered on appeal.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
970924 Virginia Housing Dev. Auth. v. Fox Run Ltd. 02/27/1998 Because the chancellor erred in finding that prior to a foreclosure the public housing authority had not made an election to impose a prepayment fee authorized under the deed of trust on a multi-family housing project, and the trustee's advertisement of the sale substantially complied with the requirements of Code § 55-59.3, the trial court's judgment is reversed and final judgment is entered on appeal.
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links