Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Hundley v. Osbourne

No. 971899Supreme Court of Virginia

971899 Hundley v. Osbourne 06/05/1998 Because evidence about a personal injury plaintiff's future medical expenses and future lost wages was subject to differing interpretations, and thus was controverted, it …

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

971899 Hundley v. Osbourne 06/05/1998 Because evidence about a personal injury plaintiff's future medical expenses and future los…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First added here
October 4, 2026
Last entry
June 5, 1998
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

971899 Hundley v. Osbourne 06/05/1998 Because evidence about a personal injury plaintiff's future medical expenses and future lost wages was subject to differing interpretations, and thus was controverted, it was error for the trial court to set aside a jury verdict on the grounds of inadequate damages and to direct a new trial. The judgment is reversed, the jury verdict is reinstated, and final judgment entered.

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

1 entry, oldest first.

  1. · Supreme Court of Virginia

    Reversed

    The court's record, as written

    971899 Hundley v. Osbourne 06/05/1998 Because evidence about a personal injury plaintiff's future medical expenses and future lost wages was subject to differing interpretations, and thus was controverted, it was error for the trial court to set aside a jury verdict on the grounds of inadequate damages and to direct a new trial. The judgment is reversed, the jury verdict is reinstated, and final judgment entered.

    Outcome words in this text: reversed.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket