Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises

No. 972378Supreme Court of Virginia

972378 Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises 09/18/1998 The trial court correctly refused to permit the plaintiff to use parol evidence to explain a purported ambiguity in a contract, and the judgment is…

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

972378 Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises 09/18/1998 The trial court correctly refused to permit the plaintiff to use pa…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First added here
October 4, 2026
Last entry
September 18, 1998
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

972378 Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises 09/18/1998 The trial court correctly refused to permit the plaintiff to use parol evidence to explain a purported ambiguity in a contract, and the judgment is affirmed.

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

1 entry, oldest first.

  1. · Supreme Court of Virginia

    Affirmed

    The court's record, as written

    972378 Martin & Martin Inc. v. Bradley Enterprises 09/18/1998 The trial court correctly refused to permit the plaintiff to use parol evidence to explain a purported ambiguity in a contract, and the judgment is affirmed.

    Outcome words in this text: affirmed.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket