Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Hoar v. Great Eastern Resort Management

No. 972334Supreme Court of Virginia

972334 Hoar v. Great Eastern Resort Management 11/06/1998 In this case involving serious injury to a skier at a resort, from the circumstances that were proven below, and according to the ordinary experience o…

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

972334 Hoar v. Great Eastern Resort Management 11/06/1998 In this case involving serious injury to a skier at a resort, from the …

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First added here
October 4, 2026
Last entry
November 6, 1998
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

972334 Hoar v. Great Eastern Resort Management 11/06/1998 In this case involving serious injury to a skier at a resort, from the circumstances that were proven below, and according to the ordinary experience of mankind, the jury was warranted in concluding that the skier's injury would not have occurred had a warning been given. The jury verdict in favor of the skier's guardian is reinstated.

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket