The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow
No. 980392Supreme Court of Virginia
980392 Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow 01/08/1999 Because there was not sufficient evidence to support the trial court's ruling that the manufacturer of a sport fishing boat breached express and implied wa…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
980392 Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow 01/08/1999 Because there was not sufficient evidence to support the trial court's ruli…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 8, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
980392 Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow 01/08/1999 Because there was not sufficient evidence to support the trial court's ruling that the manufacturer of a sport fishing boat breached express and implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, the trial court's judgment is reversed and final judgment is entered for the manufacturer.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
980392 Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow 01/08/1999 Because there was not sufficient evidence to support the trial court's ruling that the manufacturer of a sport fishing boat breached express and implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, the trial court's judgment is reversed and final judgment is entered for the manufacturer.
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links