The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Conner v. National Pest Control Association
No. 981088Supreme Court of Virginia
981088 Conner v. National Pest Control Association 02/26/1999 Enactment of the 1995 amendments to the Virginia Human Rights Act (VHRA) by the Virginia General Assembly eliminated a common law cause of action f…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
981088 Conner v. National Pest Control Association 02/26/1999 Enactment of the 1995 amendments to the Virginia Human Rights Act (…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 26, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
981088 Conner v. National Pest Control Association 02/26/1999 Enactment of the 1995 amendments to the Virginia Human Rights Act (VHRA) by the Virginia General Assembly eliminated a common law cause of action for wrongful termination based on any public policy which is reflected in the VHRA, regardless of whether the policy is articulated elsewhere. The trial court's order sustaining the demurrer of the defendant and dismissing the plaintiff's motion for judgment for failure to state a cause of action is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedDismissed
The court's record, as written
981088 Conner v. National Pest Control Association 02/26/1999 Enactment of the 1995 amendments to the Virginia Human Rights Act (VHRA) by the Virginia General Assembly eliminated a common law cause of action for wrongful termination based on any public policy which is reflected in the VHRA, regardless of whether the policy is articulated elsewhere. The trial court's order sustaining the demurrer of the defendant and dismissing the plaintiff's motion for judgment for failure to state a cause of action is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links