The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Asphalt Roads & Materials Co. v. Commonwealth
No. 980805Supreme Court of Virginia
980805 Asphalt Roads & Materials Co. v. Commonwealth 02/26/1999 Because a contract authorized additional compensation to a contractor for having provided additional backfill material in an excavation project, …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
980805 Asphalt Roads & Materials Co. v. Commonwealth 02/26/1999 Because a contract authorized additional compensation to a contra…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 26, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
980805 Asphalt Roads & Materials Co. v. Commonwealth 02/26/1999 Because a contract authorized additional compensation to a contractor for having provided additional backfill material in an excavation project, and for disposal of excess material taken from the site, final judgment is entered for the contractor as provided in the trial court. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed as to the additional compensation and the case remanded for further action in conformance with the balance of the Court of Appeals' opinion.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
980805 Asphalt Roads & Materials Co. v. Commonwealth 02/26/1999 Because a contract authorized additional compensation to a contractor for having provided additional backfill material in an excavation project, and for disposal of excess material taken from the site, final judgment is entered for the contractor as provided in the trial court. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed as to the additional compensation and the case remanded for further action in conformance with the balance of the Court of Appeals' opinion.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links