The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Mooring v. Virginia Wesleyan College
981270 Mooring v. Virginia Wesleyan College 04/16/1999 The trial court dismissed an accidentally injured plaintiff's motion for judgment, finding that the defendant college professor was a volunteer at a club …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
981270 Mooring v. Virginia Wesleyan College 04/16/1999 The trial court dismissed an accidentally injured plaintiff's motion for j…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- April 16, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
981270 Mooring v. Virginia Wesleyan College 04/16/1999 The trial court dismissed an accidentally injured plaintiff's motion for judgment, finding that the defendant college professor was a volunteer at a club for young people and entitled to charitable immunity due to the club's status as a charity. Because the defendant was not engaged in the charity's work at the time of the alleged negligence, the trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's motion for judgment. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemandedDismissed
The court's record, as written
981270 Mooring v. Virginia Wesleyan College 04/16/1999 The trial court dismissed an accidentally injured plaintiff's motion for judgment, finding that the defendant college professor was a volunteer at a club for young people and entitled to charitable immunity due to the club's status as a charity. Because the defendant was not engaged in the charity's work at the time of the alleged negligence, the trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's motion for judgment. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
