The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Wood v. Woolfolk Properties Inc.
No. 981197Supreme Court of Virginia
981197 Wood v. Woolfolk Properties Inc. 06/11/1999 In this personal injury action relating to a curbside fall near a restaurant entrance at a shopping center, it was error for the circuit court to admit eviden…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
981197 Wood v. Woolfolk Properties Inc. 06/11/1999 In this personal injury action relating to a curbside fall near a restaurant e…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 11, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
981197 Wood v. Woolfolk Properties Inc. 06/11/1999 In this personal injury action relating to a curbside fall near a restaurant entrance at a shopping center, it was error for the circuit court to admit evidence pertaining to the absence of prior accidents. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
981197 Wood v. Woolfolk Properties Inc. 06/11/1999 In this personal injury action relating to a curbside fall near a restaurant entrance at a shopping center, it was error for the circuit court to admit evidence pertaining to the absence of prior accidents. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links