The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Clark v. Scott
982377 Clark v. Scott 09/17/1999 In an appeal from a decree providing for an accounting in the dissolution of a dental partnership, the evidence does not support the chancellor's award of damages, which was fo…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
982377 Clark v. Scott 09/17/1999 In an appeal from a decree providing for an accounting in the dissolution of a dental partnershi…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 17, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
982377 Clark v. Scott 09/17/1999 In an appeal from a decree providing for an accounting in the dissolution of a dental partnership, the evidence does not support the chancellor's award of damages, which was for an amount less than that recommended by a commissioner in chancery. The trial court's judgment will be affirmed in part, reversed in part, and final judgment is rendered.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedAffirmed
The court's record, as written
982377 Clark v. Scott 09/17/1999 In an appeal from a decree providing for an accounting in the dissolution of a dental partnership, the evidence does not support the chancellor's award of damages, which was for an amount less than that recommended by a commissioner in chancery. The trial court's judgment will be affirmed in part, reversed in part, and final judgment is rendered.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
