The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
River Road Shopping Center v. Scott
990225 River Road Shopping Center v. Scott 01/14/2000 Because lease terms bound a shopping center's sureties and the damages sought were consistent with those allowed under the terms of the lease, the trial co…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
990225 River Road Shopping Center v. Scott 01/14/2000 Because lease terms bound a shopping center's sureties and the damages soug…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 14, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
990225 River Road Shopping Center v. Scott 01/14/2000 Because lease terms bound a shopping center's sureties and the damages sought were consistent with those allowed under the terms of the lease, the trial court erred in striking the landlord's evidence because of failure to mitigate damages. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
990225 River Road Shopping Center v. Scott 01/14/2000 Because lease terms bound a shopping center's sureties and the damages sought were consistent with those allowed under the terms of the lease, the trial court erred in striking the landlord's evidence because of failure to mitigate damages. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
