The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Longshore v. Commonwealth
No. 992269Supreme Court of Virginia
992269 Longshore v. Commonwealth 06/09/2000 There is no error in the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming defendant's felony conviction. The circuit court properly permitted the Commonwealth to introduce…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
992269 Longshore v. Commonwealth 06/09/2000 There is no error in the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming defendant's felon…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 9, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
992269 Longshore v. Commonwealth 06/09/2000 There is no error in the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming defendant's felony conviction. The circuit court properly permitted the Commonwealth to introduce the preliminary hearing testimony of a witness who was unavailable at trial, and the use of this transcript did not violate Virginia hearsay rules or the Sixth Amendment right of a defendant to confront the witnesses against him.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
992269 Longshore v. Commonwealth 06/09/2000 There is no error in the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming defendant's felony conviction. The circuit court properly permitted the Commonwealth to introduce the preliminary hearing testimony of a witness who was unavailable at trial, and the use of this transcript did not violate Virginia hearsay rules or the Sixth Amendment right of a defendant to confront the witnesses against him.
Outcome words in this text: affirming.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links