The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Fowler v. International Cleaning Service
000177 Fowler v. International Cleaning Service 11/03/2000 In an action for personal injuries, an employee of a retail furniture business who fell on a wet floor was the statutory fellow employee of a firm tha…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
000177 Fowler v. International Cleaning Service 11/03/2000 In an action for personal injuries, an employee of a retail furniture …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- November 3, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
000177 Fowler v. International Cleaning Service 11/03/2000 In an action for personal injuries, an employee of a retail furniture business who fell on a wet floor was the statutory fellow employee of a firm that regularly provided janitorial services at the store. The defendant cleaning service was not a stranger to the statutory employer's business and the trial court did not err in dismissing plaintiff's action with prejudice. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedDismissed
The court's record, as written
000177 Fowler v. International Cleaning Service 11/03/2000 In an action for personal injuries, an employee of a retail furniture business who fell on a wet floor was the statutory fellow employee of a firm that regularly provided janitorial services at the store. The defendant cleaning service was not a stranger to the statutory employer's business and the trial court did not err in dismissing plaintiff's action with prejudice. The judgment is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: dismissing, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
