The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Commercial Underwriters Ins. v. Hunt & Calderone
No. 000474Supreme Court of Virginia
000474 Commercial Underwriters Ins. v. Hunt & Calderone 01/12/2001 In a declaratory judgment action regarding coverage under a professional liability insurance policy, the insured had the burden to show satisf…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
000474 Commercial Underwriters Ins. v. Hunt & Calderone 01/12/2001 In a declaratory judgment action regarding coverage under a pr…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 12, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
000474 Commercial Underwriters Ins. v. Hunt & Calderone 01/12/2001 In a declaratory judgment action regarding coverage under a professional liability insurance policy, the insured had the burden to show satisfaction of conditions precedent to the contract and the insurance company had the burden on its claim of material misrepresentation. The trial court correctly found that the insured satisfied its evidentiary burden but that the insurance company did not. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
000474 Commercial Underwriters Ins. v. Hunt & Calderone 01/12/2001 In a declaratory judgment action regarding coverage under a professional liability insurance policy, the insured had the burden to show satisfaction of conditions precedent to the contract and the insurance company had the burden on its claim of material misrepresentation. The trial court correctly found that the insured satisfied its evidentiary burden but that the insurance company did not. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links