The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. Commonwealth
000509 Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. Commonwealth 03/02/2001 In environmental litigation arising under laws dealing with the quality of state waters, the protesters of the actions involved have standing to seek ju…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
000509 Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. Commonwealth 03/02/2001 In environmental litigation arising under laws dealing with the quality …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- March 2, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
000509 Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. Commonwealth 03/02/2001 In environmental litigation arising under laws dealing with the quality of state waters, the protesters of the actions involved have standing to seek judicial review of such action in a state court. The contrary judgment below is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. (Opinion edited 3/19/01)
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
000509 Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. Commonwealth 03/02/2001 In environmental litigation arising under laws dealing with the quality of state waters, the protesters of the actions involved have standing to seek judicial review of such action in a state court. The contrary judgment below is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. (Opinion edited 3/19/01)
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
