The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
AEGIS Waste Solutions v. Concerned Taxpayers
No. 001350Supreme Court of Virginia
001350 AEGIS Waste Solutions v. Concerned Taxpayers 04/20/2001 Since there was substantial evidence in the agency record upon which the Department of Environmental Quality as the trier of the facts could reaso…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
001350 AEGIS Waste Solutions v. Concerned Taxpayers 04/20/2001 Since there was substantial evidence in the agency record upon whi…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- April 20, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
001350 AEGIS Waste Solutions v. Concerned Taxpayers 04/20/2001 Since there was substantial evidence in the agency record upon which the Department of Environmental Quality as the trier of the facts could reasonably find that certain outparcels were not included in a landfill permit issued to a waste management company, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, the judgment of the circuit court is reinstated, and final judgment is entered in favor of the company and DEQ.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
001350 AEGIS Waste Solutions v. Concerned Taxpayers 04/20/2001 Since there was substantial evidence in the agency record upon which the Department of Environmental Quality as the trier of the facts could reasonably find that certain outparcels were not included in a landfill permit issued to a waste management company, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, the judgment of the circuit court is reinstated, and final judgment is entered in favor of the company and DEQ.
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links