The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
The Investor Associates v. Copeland
No. 001919Supreme Court of Virginia
001919 The Investor Associates v. Copeland 06/08/2001 The trial court committed no error in deciding a controversy among partners of a Virginia general partnership concerning the proper statute of limitations,…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
001919 The Investor Associates v. Copeland 06/08/2001 The trial court committed no error in deciding a controversy among partners…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
001919 The Investor Associates v. Copeland 06/08/2001 The trial court committed no error in deciding a controversy among partners of a Virginia general partnership concerning the proper statute of limitations, who is indebted to whom, and which of the partners have the right to wind up the partnership affairs. The order appealed from is affirmed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for such further proceedings as may be necessary to wind up the partnership affairs.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedRemanded
The court's record, as written
001919 The Investor Associates v. Copeland 06/08/2001 The trial court committed no error in deciding a controversy among partners of a Virginia general partnership concerning the proper statute of limitations, who is indebted to whom, and which of the partners have the right to wind up the partnership affairs. The order appealed from is affirmed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for such further proceedings as may be necessary to wind up the partnership affairs.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links