The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Radvany v. Davis
No. 002499Supreme Court of Virginia
002499 Radvany v. Davis 09/14/2001 In a personal injury case, the trial court did not err in refusing to allow the introduction into evidence of the amounts accepted by health care providers for the medical se…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
002499 Radvany v. Davis 09/14/2001 In a personal injury case, the trial court did not err in refusing to allow the introduction i…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 14, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
002499 Radvany v. Davis 09/14/2001 In a personal injury case, the trial court did not err in refusing to allow the introduction into evidence of the amounts accepted by health care providers for the medical services rendered to plaintiff and did not err in instructing the jury on the aggravation of a preexisting condition. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
002499 Radvany v. Davis 09/14/2001 In a personal injury case, the trial court did not err in refusing to allow the introduction into evidence of the amounts accepted by health care providers for the medical services rendered to plaintiff and did not err in instructing the jury on the aggravation of a preexisting condition. The judgment is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links