The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Pollins v. Jones
No. 010425Supreme Court of Virginia
010425 Pollins v. Jones 01/11/2002 In the trial of a wrongful death case, the evidence presented did not support a jury instruction telling the jury to enter judgment in favor of the doctor if it found that he…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
010425 Pollins v. Jones 01/11/2002 In the trial of a wrongful death case, the evidence presented did not support a jury instructi…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 11, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
010425 Pollins v. Jones 01/11/2002 In the trial of a wrongful death case, the evidence presented did not support a jury instruction telling the jury to enter judgment in favor of the doctor if it found that he chose one of two or more alternative courses of action recognized by the profession as proper. The evidence failed to show that the experts recognized or agreed that alternative procedures were proper. The judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed and the case is remanded.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedRemanded
The court's record, as written
010425 Pollins v. Jones 01/11/2002 In the trial of a wrongful death case, the evidence presented did not support a jury instruction telling the jury to enter judgment in favor of the doctor if it found that he chose one of two or more alternative courses of action recognized by the profession as proper. The evidence failed to show that the experts recognized or agreed that alternative procedures were proper. The judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed and the case is remanded.
Outcome words in this text: reversed, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links