Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher

No. 010350Supreme Court of Virginia

010350 Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher 01/11/2002 The trial court erred in barring an employer from recovering under a workers' compensation lien, as part of the settlement of a third- party wrongful death …

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

010350 Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher 01/11/2002 The trial court erred in barring an employer from recovering under a workers…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First added here
October 4, 2026
Last entry
January 11, 2002
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

010350 Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fisher 01/11/2002 The trial court erred in barring an employer from recovering under a workers' compensation lien, as part of the settlement of a third- party wrongful death action, benefits paid to persons who did not participate in the settlement of that wrongful death action. Code §§ 65.2-309 and -310 do not permit any such restriction on the amount that an employer may recover under its statutory lien. No provision in the Wrongful Death Act gives a trial court the discretion to impose limits on the amount of an employer's lien created by Code § 65.2-309.

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket