The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp.
No. 010110Supreme Court of Virginia
010110 Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. 01/11/2002 The trial court correctly interpreted a lease provision obligating a coal company that leased certain property for many years to leave intact a fu…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
010110 Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. 01/11/2002 The trial court correctly interpreted a lease provision obligating…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 11, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
010110 Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. 01/11/2002 The trial court correctly interpreted a lease provision obligating a coal company that leased certain property for many years to leave intact a functional preparation plant at the end of the lease. The trial court's judgment is affirmed with a modification: if an action for breach of contract is commenced, any damages shall be determined as of the final termination date of the lease, not the date operation of the plant ceased.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
010110 Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. 01/11/2002 The trial court correctly interpreted a lease provision obligating a coal company that leased certain property for many years to leave intact a functional preparation plant at the end of the lease. The trial court's judgment is affirmed with a modification: if an action for breach of contract is commenced, any damages shall be determined as of the final termination date of the lease, not the date operation of the plant ceased.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links